Friday, January 02, 2009

Who You Callin' Partner?

TNG is taking a much needed break from Dec 19-Jan 4. TNG will return with new content on Jan 5. Until then, please enjoy this post from the past year. Original publish date: 4/24/2008.

Why can't people just use the term boyfriend when referring to my boyfriend? I've already mentioned my disdain for the term "special friend," as it devalues the homosexual relationship and implies that gays with significant others have something to hide. That's a no brainer. However, there's a term that rankles me even more, and for less of a defined reason.

Two weeks ago, one of my better gym friends (i.e. person you like a lot but never talk to outside of the weight room) was chatting with me and asked me where my "partner" was. Not "boyfriend," not "guy you're dating," but partner. Am I in a business relationship? Am I wearing a wedding ring? I have never been able to figure out when exactly a boyfriend or girlfriend becomes a partner, and for that reason it's a nomenclature that rarely fails to make me bristle.

I have so many negative associations to "partner." A good friend of mine once admitted that partner was the word she used before she felt comfortable referring to two men as boyfriends. It has a euphemistic quality that makes me think it has straight origins, as if an old guard of liberal heteros wanted to acknowledge that us gays could have long, lasting relationships without letting us use of their special names for love.

I think the only appropriate use of the word partner is when referring to a long-time relationship where some official declaration of commitment has been declared. So if you're introducing me to your boyfriend of eight years, who is wearing your ring but unable to actually marry you through our countries backwards legal system, by all means call him your partner. If you're introducing me to a guy you've nailed a couple times and are really into, do not use the same term. It cheapens what the first couple have.

To me, "partner" is a constant reminder of how little legitimacy a gay relationship is granted by our government. If I were straight, I would either have a girlfriend or a wife. There would not be the same level of guesswork involved, trying to figure out exactly which kind of "partner" I was referring to. Does he mean "partner because we will be together for the rest of our lives?" Or "partner because we've been together for a while and 'boyfriend' isn't working anymore?" Or worse still: "Could they be business partners? They don't look gay..." (That last one is more from the straight point of view, but still...)

My boss is legally married, and every day I take pride in hearing him tell stories about his "husband." I think it's progress. When I settle down for good, I would prefer to have my relationship labeled the same as every other legitimate relationship. It might be a flawed, fucked up system, but there are things that you give up for equality.

My last reason for hating the term partner is a more personal one. When I'm walking around with my boyfriend, and someone asks us how long we've been partners, it forces an issue that no couple should have to deal with unless they're completely prepared. Its a lowkey equivalent to someone asking their son's new girlfriend "So, how long until you two get married." It can be awkward.

But mostly it's this: You have a partner in tennis. You have a partner in bridge. You have a partner in business. So really -- are any of these activities remotely comparable to a committed, loving, long term relationship?

5 comments:

Steven said...

I agree that the words are a problem. But I can't figure out what you're suggesting, if anything. You don't like "partner" because it has more than one meaning. You prefer "boyfriend." People in high school have boyfriends. "Partner" at least makes it sound like there are adults involved.

You say marriage is "fucked up" but it would solve all your linguistic problems, so you're in favor of it. Yay. Once again, marriage makes life better for the very small percentage of people who are married and the very much smaller percentage of people who stay married. (Unmarried heterosexual couples have the same problems with these terms, y'know.) The gay marriage movement looks more and more every day like a 3-year-old having a temper tantrum.

As my mom used to say, it sounds like you just need something to complain about.

meichler said...

Hey, Steven: I think maybe you read this post too quickly. His biggest complaint is that people just assume that Zack and his boyfriend have taken their relationship to the next level. Note the part about "no wedding ring."

I think single straight people who are dating call each other boyfriend and girlfriend until they take it to the next level, regardless of whether they're 15 or 50.

Why is it that, because we don't have any formally recognized institution (marriage), people can assume that Zack's boyfriend is his "partner?"

Steven said...

I got that. But it's not a unique problem for same-sex couples. Unmarried straight couples have all the same potential for misunderstandings of their relationships. What irks me is the mentality that every little snag and inconvenience is the result of homophobia.

Anonymous said...

I've had female friends who call their male partners "partners." I've actually heard lots of women do this. Some were just super down with queerness and didn't want to have to specify gender if it wasn't necessary (I assume, but I never ask). Some just find "partner" connotes equal terms, respect, and seriousness. Someone asked my friend "You got a man?" Her friend interjected, "She has a partner." I like that.

Anonymous said...

I've had female friends who call their male partners "partners." I've actually heard lots of women do this. Some were just super down with queerness and didn't want to have to specify gender if it wasn't necessary (I assume, but I never ask). Some just find "partner" connotes equal terms, respect, and seriousness. Someone asked my friend "You got a man?" Her friend interjected, "She has a partner." I like that.