Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Should We Be Watching These Olympics?

This post submitted by Parker, who sometimes writes about politics for TNG.

There's a funny scene in the movie "But I'm A Cheerleader" where all of the kids in the ex-gay camp talk about their "root," the thing in their past that made them gay. I don't know if it's really possible for an incident in someone's childhood to make them a gay man or a lesbian. If it is, my "root" was the summer Olympics. There was nothing I liked better as a kid or a closeted young adult than watching swimmers in speedos or staring at gymnasts' muscular limbs as they held onto the rings and straddled pommel horses. It was way more satisfying then sneaking peeks at the underwear ads in the JC Penney catalog. During recent Olympics, I've even attended get-togethers with other gay guys that have been all about ogling Olympian man meat.

I must say that this Olympics has not been a disappointment. The swimmers have been delicious, even with those silly full-body suits they wear these days. And it was hot watching Jonathon Horton from the American men's gymnastic team talk trash in his cute Texas accent. Plus, this year I discovered the magic of men's synchronized swimming. Televised group showers anyone? I've even found myself rooting openly for the Americans for the first time.

Before all of the hotness and nationalism won me over, though, I was prepared to sit out this Olympics. I didn't want to be a part of things this time around because I saw every Olympic-watching party and every "Beijing 2008" Coke can as an endorsement of China and the way the Chinese government treats its own people and conducts itself in the world. I'm not going to go into all the details here because we've all been beaten over the heads over the past year or so with all of the talk about how awful China is. But I think it's important to point out that the people who are putting on these games deny their citizens the right to worship as they choose and to elect and criticize their leaders. They execute thousands of people every year, often immediately after trial with a bullet to the head. They are occupying Tibet and Xinjinag against the wishes of the people who live there. And in the run up to these games, they kicked people out of their homes to make way for Olympic construction, they violently put down protests by Buddhist monks in Tibet, and they continued their support for the genocidal government in Sudan. They even attempted to sell weapons to a Zimbabwean government that was in the process of beating and killing opposition supporters.

There was a story on ESPN yesterday about how American basketball palyers Kobe Bryant and LeBron James - perhaps the best-known atheletes participating in the Olympics this time around - had promised to speak out against China's human rights record when they got to Beijing. They have been silent so far, arguing that the Olympics are not about politics. Of course they're not. They're about competition and sportsmanship and all kinds of good stuff, I guess. (They're also about a lot of people making a lot of money). But, as you're watching Jonathon Horton's (hopefully shirtless) exhibition performance later on, don't be like Kobe and LeBron. Remember the people that China's leaders oppress and kill. I will. I just wish that our government - post-Iraq, post-Guantanamo, post-waterboarding, post-warrantless wiretapping - had the moral authority to speak up in the way that we all can and call out China's leaders as the bastards and murderers that they are.

8 comments:

Philip said...

Kobe Bryant and LeBron James will never make that statement. It's a variant on Michael Jordan's old "Republicans buy sneakers, too" line. LeBron, in particular, has made it clear that he wants to achieve "global icon" status. You don't do that by attacking the government -- however corrupt -- of a country with the world's largest population. It's a matter of putting commercial endorsements ahead of human rights. One of LeBron's teammates, Ira Newble, has been trying to educate fellow NBA players about human rights abuses and get them to sign petitions -- which LeBron hasn't done. But Newble is in no danger of becoming a household name and therefore has less to lose economically.

Anonymous said...

Basketball players are probably the most homophobic athletes, so it should come as no surprise that they won't speak out against any injustice.

Stephanie said...

Anon -

I assume yr talking about male basketball players?

I'm curious, tho, why do you choose to equivocate not speaking out about China's human rights record with homophobia?

Anonymous said...

My anger is directed at the International Olympic Committee. Given Olympic history and founding principles why does the IOC allow nations with egregious, grotesque human rights violations, like China, to apply for consideration as host countries?

From the IOC Olympic Charter here are some passages from "Fundamentals of Olympism":
http://multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/en_report_122.pdf

"...Olympism seeks to create...respect for universal fundamental ethical principles."

"The goal of Olympism is...the preservation of human dignity."

"Any form of discrimination with regard to a country or a person on grounds of race, religion,
politics, gender or otherwise is incompatible with belonging to the Olympic Movement."

Several countries would be appropriate hosts for the spirit and ideal of Olympic competition. China is not one of them.

Anonymous said...

Did I ever tell you about the times I spent in the men's group shower at the Olympics? Maybe I should write that story up.

Brian said...

Why allow China to compete? Because the alternative is ostracism. Generally, ostracized countries, like the kids left out of the dodgeball game, will find other ways to attract attention. They're probably harmless little ploys, but they're nonetheless annoying. And if China really wanted to show its dissatisfaction with the international community's slap on the wrist, it could do so pretty effectively.

But that's the bigger point: it's a slap on the wrist. We can't ignore China, but we can't isolate it either, not when they have the economic clout they do. They have the US financial system by the speedos, as it were. Keeping them out of the Olympics is just going to give them the opportunity to take on the role of the scorned power without depriving them of anything in the process.

So what do we do? We win medals. We show many, many, many pictures of Michael Phelps doing what he does best. And we use other levers to remind them that what they do to their citizens is not OK.

Anonymous said...

For what it's worth, back in 2001-ish when the IOCC was deciding who would host the 2008 Olympics, there was some talk about giving China the games in the hopes that it would force them to improve their human rights record.

Guess that didn't work out quite as planned.

Anonymous said...

While it is important to recognize the human rights abuses China has committed on its people. We should also understand that it benefits the multinational corporations that take advantage of the situation (ie sweatshops, lower wages for employees, lower environmental standards, etc), including US-based ones. However, typically in discussions about China this piece is omitted. Its sorta like China is the whore that the West needs to feel like a saint.