Navel Gayzing: Gays and Vanity
Tacky or not, I'm not shy about openly joking about how vain I can be. Ever since I can remember, I've been concerned with personal style, my physique, and, of course, my hair. Even when I was a mere fashionable three years-old, I once had a sobfest in the middle of Stride Rite because they didn't have the zip-up high tops in my size. Part of this is probably due to growing up in a pop-culture obsessed society and around an older sister who once chastised me for getting her the "fatty" popsicle from the ice cream truck; but I often wonder if another part of my vanity stems from being gay. Part of spending much of my life unaware of my sexuality often meant that girls who I probably had crushes on - whether they were soccer coaches or celebrities - became girls I would simply idolize and try to mimic. Instead of just having dirty adolescent thoughts about Natalie Imbruglia, I would stare at her album cover and obsess over trying to exactly replicate her haircut. Since understanding and coming to terms with the fact that I'm gay, I've obviously become much more aware of when I am sexually attracted to a girl; however, the ambiguous morphing of what I want in a girl and what kind of girl I want to be like has hardly subsided.
When I think about it, then, it kind of makes sense that being gay might add an extra sense of vanity to one's life. If you're going after certain qualities in a person because you find those qualities appealing, doesn't it make sense that you might want those qualities yourself? Just like I was unintentionally doing when I tried to mimic the women I had the hots for - can't desiring something in someone else easily translate into desiring that same thing for yourself? For example, if you prefer people with what you consider to be an ideal physique, doesn't it make sense that you would also want that physique?
I imagine that if a straight guy looks at a picture of Rhianna and thinks, "Hot damn, that's a hot haircut!" he doesn't have to decide if he just thinks Rhianna is hot, or whether he wants to tear out the picture and take it with him on his next trip to the hair salon. Similarly if a straight girl prefers guys with big ol' pecs, she doesn't look in the mirror and think, "Damn, I actually wouldn't mind if my pecs were a little buffer, too." Us gays, though, are stuck constantly ogling members of our own sex - unintentionally noticing what we find attractive, and what we're turned off by. At times, this can be an advantage, like living a real life version of the Mel Gibson movie What Women Want. Other times, however, it can lead to being overly self-critical and, consequently, vain.
Of course, all this isn't to say that gays have a one-track mind - ourselves. Most gays I know who care about their physical appearance also care more about other, more pressing social issues. So, before anyone accuses me of calling gays superficial or self-absorbed - that's not what I'm saying. What I am attempting to say, though, is that maybe all we hear about gays being gym-, style- and appearance-obsessed kind of makes sense, and has some logical validity. We know what we want in members of our sex, and we set a standard of "well, if I want it, I should offer it" for ourselves.
Point of discussion/bashing narcissistic me: Is it possible that gays are narcissistic by mating nature?
8 comments:
good call!! i totally agree and have been saying the same thing for a while now... mostly because i have yet to meet a straight woman who loves herself as much as i love me. men are a different story, and one i dare not touch upon. i'm dying to hear others thoughts on this phenomenon!
I think this is a rather kicky little insight and agree that there is something to all of this - which A)is something of a relief as it gives a loosely rational basis to my ridiculous vanity; and B)is helpful as it helps explain too why so many gays and lesbians seem to end up with partners who are in many ways similar to one another physically (hence the whole identadyke or pete & repete phenomena).
This makes a lot of sense. My type is almost an exact replica of myself: tall, femme, brunette.
When I get dressed in the morning I think about how much I'd like to meet another lady-gay who agonizes over which pair of black ballet flats work best with her outfit.
Seriously, the thought of finding a dyke has great taste in fashion and wears the same size in clothes and shoes as me is my daily fantasy.
I also have thought about the connection/disjoint between "want" and "want to be". The converse implication factors non-trivially into my perpetual bafflement when it comes to heteros - how do you reconcile two radically disparate standards of attractiveness?
I think another facet of queer vanity is the degree to which coming out and being out requires self-awareness and general chutzpah. It seems like there is still a lot of underlying current in out culture that paints being queer as fundamentally selfish, so it doesn't seem out of line that we wind up owning that selfishness a bit.
*our culture
What's interesting about this conversation is that like-attracts-like isn't always true amongst queers. There are lots of femme/butch relationships amongst both queer men and women that I've met. More likely with women, I've found.
I've often found myself saying to my friends that when it comes to certain women, I can't tell if I want to be them, or if I want to fuck them.
In my case, those women are edgy, a bit dyky-yet-not-over-the-top, but definitely still hot women... which in my vain little head, is how I like to think of myself as well.
The funny thing is that when it comes to an actual relationship, I'm much more drawn to much more femme-y girls, and have only ever had REAL relationships with girls like that. So, I wonder what that means.
Michael, to your point about femme/butch relationships, I think a lot of that, especially for women, has to do with our socialization. As children, little girls (especially) and boys are given the traditional male/female paradigm, where the man is the protector and the breadwinner, and the woman is the nurturer and the homemaker.
We want what we are raised with (no doubt part of the reason why we want marriage rights as well). We want to fit into that...
And also, many little kids (I know, not all), if they don't fit into their prescribed gendernorm, rush to the other and try to fit in there. So once again, taking social queues about what they want and don't want, just in the opposite direction.
At least, that's my take on it.
the problem with that assessment of butch femme is then wouldn't both women be socialized to want to be the nurturer/homemaker? i'm not arguing that gender roles are not in some way inscribed in all of us, i just don't see butch/femme as some sort of fulfillment of those norms. i don't even really see it as cutting along a gender binary--to me it's more complicated, and interesting, than either/or.
Post a Comment