Know Thy Enemy
It looks like all the anger at the black community over prop 8 doesn’t match the facts. The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force press release reported that a recent study found that:
"the level of support for Proposition 8 among African Americans was nowhere close to the NEP exit poll 70 percent figure. The study looked at pre- and post-election polls and conducted a sophisticated analysis of precinct-level voting data from five California counties with the highest African-American populations (Alameda (Oakland), Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Diego and San Francisco).* Based on this, it concludes that the level of African-American support for Proposition 8 was in the range of 57-59 percent.
An in-depth analysis of the Proposition 8 vote released today shows that party affiliation, political ideology, frequency of attending worship services and age were the driving forces behind the measure’s passage on Nov. 4. The study finds that after taking into account the effect of religious service attendance."
As I suspected, “NO” votes in general are largely explained by the higher rates of religious service attendance (57 percent of African Americans attend religious services at least once a week, compared to 42 percent of whites and 40 percent of Asian Americans). If we’re going to throw stones, let's hit the right target.
The only true consistency in religion is that it bring people together….and then pits them against others. With this bloody truth in mind, I posit that we must recognize religion as the greatest enemy of mankind, and defeat it with the only weapon that can truly kill it: reason.
I know it troubles the tender hearts of many gays to compromise the concept of tolerance. The scriptural acrobatics and ecumenical spirit that religious moderates employ to save their faith from extinction is so widely accepted (among otherwise rational people) that even non-believers are willing to embrace a “live and let live” policy toward the faithful. Unfortunately, many of those we tolerate are acutely aware of what’s actually written in their “holy books”: believe this ridiculous shit or die. More than a third of our country, let's call it Jesusland, recognizes religious moderates for what they are (poseurs) and Jesusland isn't about to stop its assault on reason until totalitarian control is achieved. These zealots are too afraid of death and uncertainty to ever stop their advance, and tolerance only allows them to strengthen until their moment to strike presents itself.
You can only reason with people that operate from a place of reason. The enemy defies reason, which makes it exceptionally dangerous. Why tolerate a group of people that would kill you if left unchecked? I know, you think I’m being overdramatic. You think “most religious people would never harm me.” To that thought, consider this: from anitquity to the present, the brutal reality of belief-based action has been moderated only to the extent that people have wounded the church through reason. In other words, if it weren’t for reason, this would be your reality:
Even apparently innocuous beliefs, when unjustified, can lead to intolerable consequences. Many Muslims, for instance, are convinced that God takes an active interest in women’s clothing. While it may seem harmless enough, the amount of suffering that this incredible idea has caused is astonishing. The rioting in Nigeria over the 2002 Miss World Pageant claimed over 200 lives; innocent men and women were butchered with machetes or burned alive simply to keep that troubled place free of women in bikinis. Earlier in the year, the religious police in Mecca prevented paramedics and firefighters from rescuing scores of teenage girls trapped in a burning building. Why? Because the girls were not wearing the traditional head covering that Koranic law requires. Fourteen girls died in the fire; fifty were injured. Should Muslims really be free to believe that the creator of the universe is concerned about hemlines? –Sam Harris; The End of Faith
The sad fact is that even “smart” societies can get stupid real fucking quick. In America we have slowly gained more ground on the enemy than many, yet the rights we have achieved have come only by fighting religious dogma with the spirit of a pre-menstrual Xena, and the enemy still fights us for every inch of turf. Just ask the married couples in California or the gay people in Arkansas who now can’t adopt a child. The truth is that beliefs are principles of action. You act based on what you believe to be true, and as long as people are subject to unjustified belief demanded by the greatest power in the universe, they will do surprising, often bloody things.
Do you feel comfortable, safe, and secure in your tolerant America? Two words: Nazi Germany. Don’t think it can happen again? Turn on the television. When economies fall and educational standards plummet with them, over time collective knowledge is lost. The fearful moderate masses embrace conservatism and easy solutions, like religious zealotry. Inevitably a charismatic leader appears on the scene, compromises are made, and scapegoats are identified. Scapegoats. That neighbor with the moderate beliefs who would never hurt you? They might as well be a zombie.
Blaming heterosexual black people does not advance our fight. Engaging them with the sword of reason at every turn does. Of course, first the white gay community needs to get over its fear of black people and form strategic alliances, but that's another story entirely.
As usual, the zealots already have their swords drawn, so draw the sword of reason against them. No blood need ever be spilled, but you do need to take a political interest in what’s going on around you. Speak out against irrational beliefs used to condemn you, educate those “moderates” around you who will listen, and patiently challenge those who won't listen. Assemble allies in your own community. Inspire your religious friends to explore a true spirituality that seeks to expand subjective reality instead of suffocating it in favor of dogma created by sheep herders ravaged by their basic ignorance of the world, who would probably think YOU were God if you showed them a glowstick and snickers bar.
Give no ground. The future depends on it.
11 comments:
Reason can be just as dogmatic and brutal an ideology as any supernatural religion. (and I say this as an atheist.)
What we could all use more of is compassion and understanding-- two qualities we often lose sight of in tough times, as the tone of this article illustrates.
People have a spiritual impulse. Many are able to pursue that on their own, but most pursue that in groups. Organized religion surely can be, and usually is, a stifling, restricting phenomenon. But it won't go away. While some countries, mostly in western Europe, have become largely "unchurched", I seriously doubt that will happen in the US, and even if it does, the de-religioning of human beings will never happen worldwide. Religious moderates are our best hope for securing liberty in this country. The best course of action is to work to reform existing religions, and support the progressive groups, e.g., Unitarians, Quakers, etc.
I think that too many "rational" people are so angry due to the treatment they have experienced from some religious people that they condemn all religious folks, fundamentalist and moderate alike. Their rational arguments actually have an emotional content, a fund of deep rage. To my mind this undercuts their claims of rationality. Regarding atheists such as Harris and Hitchens, I find that they do not really represent rationality battling against irrational belief, but rather are one side in a war between two opposed belief systems. Furthermore, it has been my observation that these folks tend to think that believing in God necessitates being a religious fanatic. A person can reject fundamentalism and exclusivism without having to deny God.
I understand that atheists and agnostics can have spiritual lives, and the spiritual practices such a Buddhism can provide a vehicle for spiritual exploration without a belief in God. However, as for myself, I cannot do without a belief in God. If I didn't believe in a Higher Power to give some meaning to my existence, this life would not be tolerable.
I don't think I've ever met an atheist (in real life, not on the internet) who didn't come across like a smarmy self-satisfied teenager patting himself on the back for how much more "rational" he was. It would be amusing except it immediately becomes apparent that most of these atheists have no idea what they are talking about when they ridicule religion.
Just for example, one of main tricks of an atheist is to bring up evolution, which I feel is nicely refuted here.
Anon, your link doesn't "refute" evolution. It refutes possitivism, while conceding that evolution is completely valid within a christian framework. Nevermind that it does so by setting up a possitivism strawman that is truly awe inspiring in it's simplicity.
Apologies for my unclear wording. The usual procedure for an atheist to try to prove his case by evolution is to point out that evolution makes a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis impossible (something I readily concede). The assumption being, of course, that one is a Christian because one finds the book of Genesis a literal and compelling account of the beginning of the world, which is astonishingly naive.
Another happy wash of sunshine from my favorite sunshiney author Ben.
>; )
In fact I'm hiring Ben to run the cheer committee for the minor league hockey team I buy some day.
Seriously though, I always thought that when I heard about those statistics about the purported black vote in CA, I thought "Yeah but, the church drove those votes, and votes in other demographic groups as well..." You make good points about the scary influence of the church or charismatic leaders during troubled times.
Jimbo, I am relentlessly cheerful. I will gladly organize car wash fundraisers and elevate team spirit for your sporting organization. Unless of course, we all die first from religious extremism.
I suppose that's a good point. Don't blame blacks and single them out as the enemy. Coordinate and commingle with blacks. However, religion is the enemy. Don't talk to religious people and get to know them. Blame them for all the ills.
Seriously, the answer is the same in both cases. The gay movement needs to reach out and work together more with both blacks and religious organizations. Religions are as diverse as any group of people, including minorities. Once you engage and convince individuals of these faiths that gays aren't the devil and deserve equality, they will either abandon or modify their dogmas, if not necessarily their faiths. If you attack religion, you will only push them away and embolden them to attack back.
By the way, Ben -- that should be "Know Thine Enemy", shouldn't it?
Anonymous, I'm an atheist, and I don't think I ever try to 'make my case' by waving around evolution. A literal reading of Genesis founders on its own terms, just because Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are two different and irreconcilable accounts of creation. There are similar incompatibilities in other parts of the Bible. But pointing them out doesn't prove atheism; at most it indicates that Christianity may not be true. Nor does atheism depend on Darwin. Darwinian evolution has its problems, and like any scientific theory will probably someday be replaced with another one, so why would I want to hang my atheism on it? It's like gay people who think that our civil rights depend on our being Born This Way.
I'll agree; a lot of my fellow atheists make me uncomfortable with their misinformation. But gay Christians are no better; talk about 'smarmy, self-satisfied teenagers'!
I don't consider religion to be an alien form of thought, and I've often found that this upsets believers as much as it does atheists. Believers often like to think of themselves as existing in a separate thought-world from outsiders (be they atheists, believers in other religions, or even believers in different sects of their own religion). I don't think atheists should let them have that. After all, atheists ought to think that religion is a human invention, just like atheism. So we're not really so different, and compassion and mutual understanding is possible.
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/07/7857
Gays tend to respond in one of two ways. A small number of persons seemed to see this as some vindication of their own personal racial animus. But nearly all other gay writers, bloggers, and opinion spouters immediately sought to dismiss, discount, or deny this figure and what it had to say.
Post a Comment