Next Steps
Two weeks ago, TNG featured the "Where is Our Anger?" post, reporting on a specific hate crime in Adams Morgan; asking why we - as a gay community - are not outraged; and calling for more action against this kind of hatred. A week ago, two gay men were attacked on their way to Be Bar. Now, this week, one of those men, Tony Hunter, is no longer alive. Where is our anger? I think we have found it. I think many of us feel it boiling inside of us either in the form of disgust, vengeance or sadness.
On the metro last night, as I thought about what had happened, I remembered when I came out to my mom and she started crying. When she later talked to me about why she was so upset, she said, "I am just so worried about you; I hear people talking in the lunchroom at work, I see the stuff on TV - people are mean." Like many gays, I assured my mom that I don't care what people say, and that the things she saw on TV would not happen to me because I am careful. This week, however, like many DC gays, I wondered if they might.
Instead of writing about it or worrying about it, however, I want to do something about it. One thing I can't stand is a person who wants change, but refuses to make an action plan to go about making that change. However, when I tried to brainstorm ideas for some sort of action plan, I couldn't help but think : What the fuck are we supposed to do?
First off, I wonder what we even want our goal to be - Are we seeking more protection from the government? Do we want more support from the communities we live in? Are we looking to create a new social mindset in terms of what it means to be gay? Sure, ideally, we are seeking all of the above, but I believe that for the sake of successful coordinated action, we need some sort of particular goal.
Unlike other social movements, the battle against homophobia is tricky in that while homophobia is definitely institutionalized in things like marriage and a broad lack of protections against being discriminated against, we don't have things like Jim Crow laws or other actively prejudiced laws that flat out tell us we can't do fundamental social actions like vote or run for office.
Basically, I wonder - Who should we be mad at? If we're angry, to whom or to what do we channel that anger?
It's useless to get angry at whole communities, because loosely defined geographical borders don't mean that everyone within those borders thinks the same way. If we get mad at the police, why are we mad at them? The Metro DC police might not be completely supportive in responding to likely hate crimes, but I don't believe they are out on the street preaching homophobia, either. Police condone homophobia in the same way that they condone racism or misogyny or any other prejudice that ultimately comes down to the person who harbors it. If we're going to take action, whom do we take it against, other than the obviously crazy assholes who commit the violence themselves?
All of this makes me think, though, that maybe it's time to step it up and really push to convince the government (read: the Republican Party) that all their public moral touting is actually trickling out of Congress and MSNBC and onto the streets of society. By acting like we are people whose morality is to be debated, politicians and right-wing religious whacks who receive airtime are not only focusing the spotlight on themselves, but they're also focusing it on the real lives of the millions of gays around the world. Do we sit here getting mad at different classes, races, and police departments, or is it time we step it up and put greater effort into convincing people that gays are not people whose lives are to be debated, and that aside from sexual preference, we are no different than straight people?
Again, though, I come back to the big question - How do we do this?
This post is not meant to tell people that their gripes with the DC police are useless or uncalled for, or that the battle against hate crimes is a futile one. Instead, I am simply looking for real, concrete next steps that we can take. Instead of just blogging and discussing, what real-life actions can we take to decrease hateful, and sometimes deadly, acts against gay people?
10 comments:
Thanks for this, Stephanie. I think blog or e-based discussions about things like this are valuable. If anything, it provides our community with a relatively unique look into what we all really think and whether we can, in good faith, proceed forward in unity.
I think that we need to remain visible, fundraise if necessary, and collectively come together with a unified goal. What is that? I'm not sure. I think that the primary thing we need to do first is work out the interpersonal shit that divides our community, first. Whether that involves community discussion nights, informal polls, or a cab-initiative like a "Late Night Ride Home" where we work with DC cabs for reduced fares for people who feel unsafe heading home...we have a myriad of options at our disposal.
But first, we need to figure out who and or what we need to face first. And I think that is, at this point, incredibly unclear.
I'm with you, sister.
"How do we do this?"
That's a big question with a lot of ways to go about it. Changing people's attitudes, values and beliefs is no easy task.
However, I've seen a growing need over the past couple of years for activism and organization beyond the few now-institutionalized groups that tout being our representatives to our elected officials. I think HRC is often jumping the gun, and there's a need to rebuild awareness and knowledge of who we are, simply because there's so many negative beliefs about us. We're still a simple tool to evoke fear in the hearts of those people easily manipulated by fear-driven politics. We are perceived as the cause, not the symptom, of gentrification.
I've always believed that being out and open about my orientation is a big help. As for making change locally, I see a need to help gays at least be aware that they're not in Kansas anymore in terms of safety.
http://www.metroweekly.com/gauge/?ak=3772
The discussion on this Metro Weekly article that was referenced earlier is very interesting, and the news about the reactivation of GLOV-GLBT are great. We could decide to concentrate on that initiative to handle the immediate, acute problem of hate crimes.
The next GLOV-GLBT Anti-Violence Group meeting is Monday, Sept. 22, from 7:30 to 9 p.m. at 1101 New York Ave. NW. For more information, visit The Center online at www.thedccenter.org.
I'll be happy to hear suggestions on how to handle the more chronic problems of race and class.
Interesting but not surprising that this comment thread is significantly less populated than the more racially-charged entry previous. Controversy is fun, no doubt, but I suspect the relative radio silence following this post has more to do with just how complex and at times, seemingly hopeless dealing with community violence can seem.
That said, is there a history of any door-to-door awareness campaigns in this area organized by citizens? I believe (but do not have the experience to prove) that such an activity would accomplish a few aims:
1.) Bring personal awareness to neighbors of the danger posed by violent crime in their neighborhood,
2.) Put a face and a personality on the potential victims of said crime,
3.) And, perhaps most importantly in the long run, instantiate and cultivate personal ties to neighbors that could very well extend far beyond the immediate threat of harm, and build a more stable sense of community across race/class lines.
I would guess that for an activity of this nature to be successful, the issue of violent crime would need to be discussed in a way that is as gender/race/sexual orientation neutral as possible, to drive home the point that community violence is a shared problem, not something exclusively in the domain of one group. More importantly, it shows that we do not consider violence against any identified subset of the community to hold greater importance than against any other.
Just a thought. In my experience it's a lot more difficult to distrust or dislike someone if you've seen their face and heard their voice, and they in turn have heard yours. I guess that's what I'd consider to be a neighbor, rather than simply a geographically convenient citizen.
we don't have things like Jim Crow laws or other actively prejudiced laws
Oh, yes we do. Come across the river to VA: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/06/AR2006080600797.html
"That's Revolting" is a great book, and a good reference point for this.
Just today, I was walking past the National Press Building and some protest was underway about trade between her and Columbia (??? not sure, honestly), and I heard the same tired chant rhythm with the same tired signs and people pacing in front of a building. You know what most people did? Avoided that side of the street, chattered into their cell phones, etc.
I really think that protests have become almost cookie cutter models of something that worked in the
'60s and '70s but not so much now.
Queer people are a creative bunch. What about drag (king and queen) bake sales, glitter encrusted street theater, choreographed funerals, etc.? Something creative might get us more play, more excitement among the queer community itself and perhaps some more action done.
Funny you should mention that protest because I am the "anonymous" who recommended That's Revolting and I was participating in that protest. I like your creative action ideas, Greg.
FYI: Folks, that protest today was about the US-Colombia Free Trade Agreement and everyone should support other struggles for social, environmental and economic justice and contact Congress people to oppose it (or Eleanor Holmes Norton and then tell your friends with voting rights in Congress to take action)
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/no_colombia_trade_deal
http://action.citizen.org/t/1153/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=24348&track=web
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/colombia_fta2008
http://transafricaforum.org/action-center/urgent-action/-us-colombia-free-trade-agreement-tool-ethnocide
http://www.tradeandwar.org/take-action.html
Finally, one more pitch for taking this conversation in to real life instead of just over the internet. If we really want to plan an effective response, we cannot do it in a space like this.
In the words of Le Tigre,
"Get off the Internet!
I'll meet you in the street
Get off the Internet!
Destroy the right wing"
Hey, Anonymous,
Yes, I totally agree that we need to expand our vision into other areas of social justice/active equality issues. Thank you for clarifying what that was about.
So, any suggestions from folks on getting together on this stuff?
I am reminded of Peter Staley's meth ads in New York in January 2004. One gay man producing those ads are what got the whole meth debate going. Angered and frustrated over the inaction and disinterest to the meth epidemic in gay men Staley paid for and produced the ads himself.
DC is faced with the same inaction and disinterest to anti-gay violence from law enforcement and the Mayor's office. I think no one is going to anything. Like Staley, we need to create and pay for this ourselves.
Similar to Staley's meth ads we could create anti-gay violence ads. They should be installed in and around subway/bus stations, bars/clubs, and Dupont/Logan/Adams Morgan/Columbia Heights. Maybe some rich anonymous donor can fund this and some really talented queers can come up with some graphics?
Here's some background on the meth ads...
http://www.aidsmeds.com/Crystal.shtml
There should be a push to make bar owner's responsible.
Have them post signs reminding guys to 1) drink responsibly, and 2) be careful and alert on their way home. Bars and clubs should pull their weight if they expect to make money off of crime victims.
Anon -
I actually really like the idea of ads. They seem so "lazy" but they really are good ways to share an idea with large numbers of people, and to get people talking.
My favorite anti-homophobia advertisement is one that used to be up when I lived in Brooklyn - it showed a happy baby and his mom and asked "Would you stop loving him now if you knew he's gay?"
I think it made an amazing point, and made people think and talk. Unfortunately there were very few of them around town.
Post a Comment