Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Slum Historique


On a weekend night a couple of months ago, an SUV passed me on 9th Street as I walked home from DC-9. A black woman leaned out of her window and screamed at me, “Be careful, this is a dangerous neighborhood!” I yelled back, “I know, I live here.” Momentarily stunned, she still managed a good natured “I live here too,” before riding off into the night. While it’s now common for gay boys to walk this stretch of road between Bebar and Nellie's, the area of Rhode Island and 9th is anchored by a large housing project that keeps the neighborhood hot. That very night there was a shooting a block from where I had the SUV conversation, and a block from where I live.

It’s not the first time shots have been fired in this project. I’ve written about life in Shaw previously, and not much has changed except that there is a police vehicle parked near my house on a semi-permanent basis. On the weekends they sometimes park a giant strobe light machine near the Metro station, the idea being that drug dealers, psychopaths, and general miscreants scatter like roaches at the first sign of light. How’s that for 21st century policing.

If you’ve ever walked up 9th Street you’ve seen the “Bienvenue a Shaw; Slum Historique” text that is painted on the side of a vacant commercial property at the corner of 9th and Rhode Island. Around the time of my conversation with said SUV, someone painted over the “Slum Historique” part, apparently asserting that Shaw was no longer a slum.

More than a year of living here provides me with many words to describe my area of Shaw, but “slum” is the most efficient and honest. I can respect the optimism and desire for increased property values that would inspire a person to slather white paint over those black words, but I respect truth and its searing judgment even more, and that’s why I painted them back. For every optimistic intention, I can show you a decaying and neglected building with a homeless man sleeping in its doorway, a bush festooned with the ornamentation of condoms and syringes, a constant call for my dollar by vagrant parades running past my stoop, and the kaleidiscope of police lights spinning across my living room ceiling, a gift from the patrol car parked across the street in a state of perpetual alert.

I'm not complaining, because these conditions keep my rent cheap. It’s unfortunate that my life expectancy drops a couple of percentage points by living here, but I can accept that. I can even find benefit in that. What I can’t accept is pretending my neighborhood is something it’s not. To me, that’s a more dangerous proposition than eating taquitos at the 7-11 on 7th Street, because it tells the rest of the world that rolls through Shaw that everything is OK here, and it lulls the gentrifiers into a false sense of security.

I don’t know how long “Slum Historique” will stay up this time. I’ve already decided that I won’t put it back if it goes away again, but if it does get white washed, it will be a shame. This weekend I repainted the “s” in slum (long story) about an hour before a hard rain fell consistently across Shaw. It wasn’t enough time for the oil-based paint to dry, yet not a sliver of paint smeared from the letter. I take this as a sign that Shaw is not yet ready for the ideals of those bearing white paint.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ben - keep up the good fight. What a shame it would be to stroll through your hood in ten years only to see PN Hoffman developments and Logan Tavern's new "The Shaw" outpost.

Anonymous said...

I appreciate the desire to call something what it is. But there is also something to be said for addressing the problem. We may all recognize that gentrification isnt the answer but that doesnt mean that anyone should have to live in neighborhoods overwhelmed with poverty and violence. Often it seems like the same people who criticize gentrification also enjoy the griddy character, and the cheap rent, that poverty provides. There is a difference between choosing to accept whatever percentage points living in Shaw takes off your life expectancy and having little hope of a higher life expectancy - not before or after PH Hoffman developments shows up.

Anonymous said...

With all due respect, this and related posts about life in Shaw smack of smug self-righteousness. I'll grant that Shaw has a serious crime problem, but it is not a 'slum' by any stretch; to label it as such devalues the term and offends people who actually live in slums - people for whom sidestepping discarded condoms and a handful of bums are but afterthoughts.

Chris said...

I don't think you can pull the word "slum" out of this phrase. Let's keep in mind that the original phrase and the re-paint is "slum historique." I feel that "slum historique" carries with it some idea of the past and how that past has shaped the neighborhood. No one can argue that Shaw is a changing neighborhood. But if the neighborhood changes while maintaining a self-awareness of it's past, then hopefully we won't end up with a boring, generic run of streets with new and sterile condo buildings that all look alike. "Historique" brings with it connotations of the role Shaw played in the DC riots, it has the strength of Howard University and the idea of community.